Tuesday, March 25, 2008
The Common Cold is an Abomination Unto Nuggan
Well, in case the 2 people who might actually read what I write don't know, I'm a recent...convert. I pretty much poopoo all "herbal" remedies. However, just before Christmas, my MD recommended trying some Sambucol. Sambucol is elderberry extract. Some very, very (did I mention very?) limited studies suggest that Sambucol is effective in reducing the duration and severity of influenza when taken within 24-48 hours of the onset of symptoms, comparable to tamiflu. That's no small claim, and hasn't been backed up or disproven by any good studies yet. In addition, it has been reported that it also helps with colds. Notice the passive voice, a common tactic when trying to pass one over on people. I don't know who reported it, or in what study, or was it just anecdotal.... However, being 4 days before Christmas, I decided to give it a shot, even though my skepticism protested mightily when I shelled out $13 for something like 2 oz of syrup.
I wouldn't be writing this if it didn't seem to work. I started getting symptoms on Thursday night. I took it, and I was symptom-free by Wednesday. No big deal? Actually, it is. I'm the type of person that gets over a "7-10 day" cold in something like 3 weeks. I don't know why, but I've always been like that. Every time I've read about how you get over colds in 7-10 days, my first thought is, "7-10 days my ass..."
There have been a couple of colds going around the office since then. I've gotten a minor sore throat during their spread, started the Sambucol, and I never really got sick. Minor throat irritation is as far as it went.
So this time, I ignored the sore throat. I didn't think it was a virus. Everything is yellow because of pollen, and I do react mildly to it, though I don't suffer like most people. I just blamed that for the slight scratchiness in my throat. I started to notice something was irritating me late Saturday. When I got up Sunday, it wasn't gone, and by Sunday night, I decided to start the Sambucol. Monday, still a sore throat, and I noticed the bumps in my throat when I got home from work. Today I went to the doctor and tested negative for strep.
I kept saying that I was going to start keeping track of my Sambucol use and results, making it a little less anecdotal, though admittedly the sample size is still only one. So here we are. I am sick. Like I said, it's still just mostly a sore throat, but I'm keeping track of the duration of the symptoms this time, good results or bad. I have no agenda except for my intense dislike of sickness, though I wonder if I should buy some stock....
Saturday, February 2, 2008
UFO Hunters is an Abomination unto Nuggan
They were investigating the Maury Island Incident. The story goes that 2 weeks before Roswell, a number of doughnut-shaped craft were flying and one was starting to have trouble. It ejected some molten slag-like material which landed on some guy's boat, killing his dog, and breaking his son's arm. It then recovered, and the UFO's flew off. Some time later, 2 Air Force intelligence officers come to investigate, get the material from the boat guy, and on their way back, their B-25 crashed.
The fisherman or whatever was very specific about where he was, so they go to see if they can find some of this slag. They had a search area of about 6000 sq. ft. They had one guy scuba diving, and he picks up some sand samples, and a few rocks, one of which somewhat fit the description of the supposed slag. I thought it looked like igneous rock myself.
Then they went to the plane crash site. They got some soil samples, some pieces of wreckage, and went home.
The official story was that an engine fire brought down the plane. The left wing came off before the crash. The 2 survivors said that there was a fire that spread so fast that it was impossible to think of putting it out. They spent most of the show trying to "prove" that the unidentified material caused the plane to crash.
So the samples come back to the lab. They're examined. What I thought looked like igneous rock was....igneous rock (and I ain't no geologist neither). The soil samples showed evidence of a hot fire. The fuselage pieces showed evidence of a hot fire.
So their "evidence" led one of them to make a wild-assed claim that the plane's fuel couldn't create a fire that hot. Um...did he not watch 2 towers fall down because of a fire caused by kerosene (err...I mean "jet fuel")?
Then, they start theorizing about the cause of the crash, making the "slag" culpable of course. They showed that a strong magnet could interfere with a relay. Then they showed that an overloaded circuit would burn up. Then they showed that some unidentified material that they simply identified as "slag" would burn at 4000 degrees, and that would melt an aluminum (melts at 1200 degrees) fuselage. So if the slag was highly magnetic, it could have tripped a relay that overloaded a circuit, that ignited the slag that melted through the fuselage. Now that thar' am sum gud siense.
Memorable quotes (as best as they can be remembered):
(At the plane crash site) "Right under our feet could be the very first physical evidence of UFO's"
- Bill Birnes, J.D. Publisher of UFO Magazine since 1986.
You know, I think I'd have found a new occupation after the first 20 years of no evidence, much less the lack of evidence since the craze started in 1947 or so.
"There is no evidence of extraterrestrial involvement, but nothing that disproves it either."
-Ted Acworth, Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering Design, obviously not understanding how science works, or trying desperately to keep a job.
You know Ted, my personal theory is that it was a dragon in need of some Imodium, but couldn't quite make it to the little dragon's room. Do you have any evidence that disproves that? I seriously hope that you were forced to say that, because a Columbia and Stanford-educated and MIT employed professor such as yourself should know better. That, or I'm really glad I didn't get into MIT.
As an aside, please pardon the weird spacing. The text doesn't seem to wrap correctly, so I put in some hard returns.